The Latest from TechCrunch |
- What I Want in My New Google
- Facebook Valued At $67.5 Billion In SecondMarket’s 10th Auction
- Socialcam: A Look At Justin.tv’s Upcoming ‘Instagram for Video’
- TechCrunch Giveaway: Tickets to Sarah Lacy’s SF Book Launch Party, PLUS A Free Signed Copy Of Her New Book
- Voyurl Is Climbing In Your Browser Window, Snatching Your Surfing History Up
- Libya Follows Egypt’s Lead, Starts Shutting Off Internet Services
- Fly Or Die: Apple’s New Subscription Rules (With Rhapsody President Jon Irwin)
- Have Work, Will Travel: LiquidSpace Aims To Test Their ‘AirBnb For Workspaces’ At SXSW
- Sarah Lacy’s SF Book Launch Party Is ON! Tickets Available… Now
- Last Tweets Users See On Banned Client Twidroyd Pushed By Twitter
- The Missing Native/Web App Link: Google Says Native Client Almost Ready To Go
- UberMedia CEO Bill Gross: Twitter Turn-Off “Took Us By Surprise,” But “We Will Change”
- Groupme And Foursquare Allow You To Create Texting Groups With Friends Nearby
- Twitter Suspends UberMedia Clients For Privacy And Monetization Violations, Trademark Infringement
- Radiohead’s Day Early Online Release Of ‘The King Of Limbs’ Goes Viral
- TechCrunch Giveaway: A Boxee Box #TechCrunch
Posted: 19 Feb 2011 07:00 AM PST I sent my first e-mail message in 1995, to a member of my development team. That was the only person I knew who had an e-mail address in those days. I also did my first web search around that time. I think I used Lycos for this. I entered some keywords into a text box, separated by Boolean operators, and received a list of web pages that I could click on that referenced these words. Sixteen years has passed. I receive about 400 e-mails a day now from people all over the world. E-mail has become part of my life and has changed the way I communicate and the way I work. I don't know anyone anywhere who doesn't have an e-mail address. When I went to Sikkim, India, last year, a Buddhist monk in a remote Himalayan monastery even gave me his e-mail address. The web has also evolved in a similar fashion—it seems to be everywhere and connects everyone, for everything. Internet technologies are now toppling dictatorships in the Middle East. But what has really changed in search? We still go to the same text boxes, enter expressions that we hope the computer will understand, get back lists of web pages that reference those words, and click on links to find the information we are looking for. The only real difference is that now the top links take you to spam sites—which want you to click on other links that make them money and that make Google money. Creating low-quality, low-cost information pages has become such big business that the leading content farm, Demand Media, just went public and is valued at $1.9 billion. According to Blekko's spam clock, over 1 million spam pages are created every hour. So the web is becoming one giant heap of trash. I had hoped to put Google and Bing on the spot at the recent BigThink conference by challenging them to fix the spam problem; perhaps to follow Blekko's bold lead in blacklisting the leading polluters. But they instead got into a pissing match about who was copying whom. Google simply changed the subject. And when I asked the panelists about their long-term vision on search, I was really disappointed at the shallowness of the response. They weren't talking about changing the world—just about fine-tuning what they’ve been doing forever. You can watch the video below to see what I mean. In the hope that I don't have to wait another 16 years to see advancements in search, I'll share my views on where it needs to go. Perhaps you can also share your views and we can inspire a new generation of startups to do to the current search leaders what Google did to Lycos and AltaVista: antiquate them. In a nutshell, what I want is for my computer—or a new Google—to serve me. I don't want to be serving it words that make sense to it, and then have to wade through pages of spam it delivers to me, to find the information I am seeking. I want it to learn what I like and what my friends like and tell me what I want to know or do what I need it to. If I am visiting New York City tomorrow and want to eat dinner at a moderately priced North Indian restaurant near where I am staying, I want my computer to suggest the two or three places that I will like and that have space available. I book my flights and hotel reservations on line, have my calendar on Google, tweet my likes and dislikes, and talk to my friends on different social media sites, after all. So why can't my new Google simply take my information and my friends’ information and give me what I want? Is this so hard? I don't think so. This week, we witnessed a computer, Watson, beating the top Jeopardy contestants. It was able to parse human speech patterns, make sense of complex questions, do very sophisticated searches, and come back very quickly with the right answer. It didn't respond with a series of links—it computed the probability that its answer was correct and responded accordingly. Watson's technology is a great start, but I want much more. I also want it to analyze my social graph and get recommendations from friends who matter. For example, when it comes to Indian food, I don't care what my academic peers say or what my South Indian friends say; I want input from fellow Punjabis—they know their tikka masalas and saag paneers better than anyone else does. If I am looking for health-related advice, I want to know what doctors say. If I am shopping for a gift for my wife, I want input from women who share her tastes. This isn't rocket science. And then I want more. I want my new Google to automatically make a dinner reservation for me, buy me a ticket to a movie that I may want to watch, or place an order on the cheapest and most reliable shopping site. Yes, I know there are already many applications/sites that do this. Why aren't my preferred sites integrated into the search function—so I never have to see the 90s-era text links? What I really don't ever want to see is the spam that Google delivers. The present page-ranking system is easy to bait—just add the right key words to some garbage content or pay Google for an ad, and your listing appears at the top of everyone's search results. Google took some good steps forward this week with its announcement that it will let users tag sites as spam via a Chrome extension and rank the websites of people they know higher than others. But this is still more of the same—the spammers still get top billing. Just do a search on a term like "digital camera under $200" to see what I mean. The results are practically useless. (Bing just added a nice option to let you search by price, but that is buried in its spammy results when you do a regular search). We need some out-of-the-box thinking here. I doubt we will see this from Google, because it makes billions by serving up ads. So here is an excellent opportunity for entrepreneurs. Editor's note: Vivek Wadhwa is an entrepreneur turned academic. He is a Visiting Scholar at UC-Berkeley, Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School, Director of Research at the Center for Entrepreneurship and Research Commercialization at Duke University, and Distinguished Visiting Scholar at The Halle Institute for Global Learning at Emory University. You can follow him on Twitter at @vwadhwa and find his research at www.wadhwa.com. |
Facebook Valued At $67.5 Billion In SecondMarket’s 10th Auction Posted: 18 Feb 2011 06:39 PM PST Last time we checked in with SecondMarket in late January, Facebook shares had declined from the auction’s high point at $28.26 a share (a $70 billion + valuation) to $26.25 a share which means a $65.5 billion valuation going by its 2.5 billion shares outstanding. While at the time we had speculated about a peak and signs of a decline, shares are up 2.85% this week in SecondMarket’s 10th Facebook auction, at $27.00 a share and a $67.5 billion valuation. What’s changed (again)? Continued market exuberance as Facebook platform developer Zynga’s valuation slowly rises and reports of a Kleiner Perkins investment at $52 billion. Guess we’ll have to get the interns to update our infographic. Full SecondMarket mail below.
|
Socialcam: A Look At Justin.tv’s Upcoming ‘Instagram for Video’ Posted: 18 Feb 2011 04:56 PM PST Between the likes of picplz and Instagram, image-sharing sites are making plenty of headlines these days. And there’s one obvious offshoot that seems ripe for similar services: video. Granted, Path offers support for video, but it’s semi-private and there could still be an opportunity for a more public service to tap into this trend.That’s where Justin.tv’s upcoming app Socialcam comes in. The app, which remains in a very limited beta, is looking to to offer a straightforward way for people to capture and share their videos with friends — and yes, it’s doing that in a way that is very similar to Instagram and picplz, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I sat down with Justin.tv founder Justin Kan and VP of marketing Matthew DiPietro to get a tour of the app, and have also gotten the chance to play around with the Android version myself. Kan says that it’s frustratingly difficult to share video taken on your phone with friends: email attachments are a pain because of size issues, and MMS leads to heavily degraded video quality. YouTube makes it easy to upload directly from your phone, but the focus there doesn’t seem to be on sharing your clips with a network of friends. And posting a video to Facebook is way harder than it should be, which is why the company started working on Socialcam last fall. A significant number of Justin.tv videos are watched as archived footage (as opposed to live streams), but this is the first time the company will be launching a product that’s dedicated exclusively to recorded footage. The app, which will be available for both Android and iPhone, is pretty simple: after firing it up you’re asked to log-in via Facebook Connect, which is currently the only login option. The app presents you with a list of your Facebook friends who are already on Socialcam and asks if you’d like to ‘Follow’ them (Socialcam uses a one-way follower model like Twitter). After that, you’ll spend most of your time looking at the stream of Socialcam videos posted by your friends. Each video is represented by four frame grabs — tapping on one will cause the video player to pop open the clip will start playing immediately. You can leave comments and ‘Like’ each video, and you can also tag your friends in clips. If you tag a friend who isn’t on Socialcam, it will still show up on their Facebook wall (and the video is playable directly from there — you don’t have to click a link). There are a few other nice touches. I’ve been using the Android app, and aside from some quirks you’d expect from a beta, it’s clear that a lot of attention is being given to the UI, with smooth transitions and so on. One of my favorite features: Socialcam uses face identification when it generates the preview thumbnails for each video, so you wind up seeing photos of your friends instead of a shot of someone’s shoe or the wall. The application also uses “streaming upload” — as soon as you start shooting a video, it will start uploading to Justin.tv’s servers, which reduces how long you’ll have to wait before you can publish it. Kan and DiPietro acknowledge that they aren’t the only ones looking to launch an ‘Instagram/picplz/etc’ for video — given the popularity of these services, it’s an obvious idea. There will be plenty of competition, but Socialcam has a chance at being first to market, with launch planned for just before SXSW. Of course, there’s still the question of whether users will be as quick to latch onto a video-oriented sharing service — people tend to get more upset when you post a video of them without their permission, and it’s obviously quicker to take a snapshot. Oh, and the first 20 people to sign up at this link will be added to the beta. Be quick!
|
Posted: 18 Feb 2011 04:20 PM PST Want to come celebrate Sarah Lacy’s new book with us in San Francisco? Here’s your chance. We are giving away a total of 10 free tickets to her launch party, all of which include a free signed copy of her critically acclaimed new book, Brilliant, Crazy, Cocky: How The Top 1% of Entrepreneurs Profit From Global Chaos. We will give 5 free tickets away for this giveaway, then another 5 away next week. As Paul Carr noted, Sarah’s new book has been called “a fascinating new gem of a book” by USA Today, and “an outstanding piece of journalism” by Fortune. The party will start at 6:00pm PST on Wednesday, March 9th at the amazing SWIG in San Fransisco. If you are one of our winners, your ticket will include an open bar, free food, and a signed copy of her book. If you’d like to come to this awesome party, all you have to do is the following. 1) Make sure you fan our TechCrunch Facebook page: 2) Then do one of these two things: - Retweet this post (making sure to include the #TechCrunch hashtag) The contest will end tomorrow, February 19th at 5pm PST. Please only tweet the message once or you will be disqualified. We will go through the comments and tweets, make sure you added us on Facebook, and contact you this weekend with details if you are chosen. Anyone can enter, but please note this is a giveaway for tickets only, and does not include airfare. You can also still find tickets on sale here. Hurry though because they will sell out fast. Good luck everyone and we hope to see you at the party! |
Voyurl Is Climbing In Your Browser Window, Snatching Your Surfing History Up Posted: 18 Feb 2011 03:59 PM PST It was back in July of last year that we first wrote about a service called Voyurl with the headline: It's Hard To Tell If Voyurl Or Their Ads Are Creepier. You see, at the time, the still-in-stealth startup was targeting angel investors via Google ads get their attention to hopefully talk about their product. That’s actually pretty smart. So we had to give the edge to the product itself being creepier. You see, its aim was to be a service that made your entire browsing history public. At the time, we said the best way to think of this was as a sort of “Blippy but with more potential porn”. Of course, Blippy has since been tweaking its service to be less about public sharing of your purchases and more about the social dynamics of purchases and recommendations. But fear not, Voyurl is gladly picking up the creepy mantle! After all that time in stealth, the service finally launched in private beta recently. I’ve had a chance to test it out for a bit and it really is pretty amazing. By using a Chrome extension, they not only keep track of everything you browse on the web and publish it in a realtime updating list, but they can also publish your back-history of surfing as well. So who the hell would want to possibly use this? Well, first of all, it is kind of fun. If you only browse sites you don’t mind sharing, or just don’t care in general, this is a fun way to share those sites with others. And it’s a fun way to easily keep track of these sites. And to get/give recommendations. More importantly, with the extension, you can easily pause the tracking — or you can set it to be anonymous with the click of a button. And you can stream just individual URLs (either with your name attached or anonymously). And if you do choose to share, you’ll be adding your data to a growing database of interesting data from Voyurl users. You can easily see the system-wide Top URLs, for example. Here you’ll find that, unsurprisingly, Facebook dominates followed by Twitter, Tumblr, Google, Engadget, and even TechCrunch (though the amount of time spent on Facebook compared to other sites really is pretty amazing). You can also break those charts down by categories or domains. And you can see the top users of the service based on both total site visits and total time spent browsing overall. In other words, this gives you great insight into the true Internet addicts. So far, those in the beta seem to be the nerdy, early-adopter type who actually browse Reddit more than porn. But when this baby opens up to the regular public, I cannot wait to see what we find. Obviously, this is very use-at-your-own risk. And things are still a bit buggy. But if you want to try out Voyurl, use this link made for TechCrunch readers. It should get about 500 of you into the beta. Really, just be careful what you browse with it on. I’ll be watching. No really, I will be watching. |
Libya Follows Egypt’s Lead, Starts Shutting Off Internet Services Posted: 18 Feb 2011 03:57 PM PST @bbc_global BBC Global News BREAKING: Col Muammar Gaddafi's government in Libya has taken a series of measures, including blocking internet … http://bbc.in/gUVJNN Both the BBC and the AFP are reporting that Muammar Gaddafi’s government in Libya has begun to block user access to Facebook in the country’s capital of Tripoli and is sporadically shutting down electricity access and access to Internet connections in the rest of the country as a response to anti-govermental protests. Effective Measure CEO Scott Julian has confirmed to TechCrunch that Internet access in Libya is indeed restricted, but not totally cut off. Effective Measure measures analytics tags on pages like arabia.msn.com within the MENA region. Says Julian:
Twitter user Ramy Raoof says that sources in Libya have cited the Facebook blocks, but that Twitter.com is still not blocked and Internet access is not yet down. I have contacted both companies for information and will update this post as soon as they respond. You can follow the events in Libya on Twitter at #Libya and #Benghazi. @RamyRaoof Ramy Raoof according to friends in #Libya- facebook.com blocked, twitter.com not blocked. Internet is not down (i am chatting with them now) #Feb17 about 18 hours ago via webRetweetReply Al Jazeera is also reporting access to its Aljazeera.net site being cut off as well as access to select Facebook opposition groups. This is reminiscent of the steps former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak took to cut off Internet access in Egypt before popular uprisings lead to his resignation. View the BBC’s video here. As with Egypt, Telecomix is offering a free dialup number to Libyans who are having trouble connecting. @marwame Marwa Elnaggar RT @ChangeInLibya: RT @sunnkaa: PLS RT!…+494923197844321 User: Telecomix Password: Telecomix 12 lines for Libyans only #Libya #Benghazi |
Fly Or Die: Apple’s New Subscription Rules (With Rhapsody President Jon Irwin) Posted: 18 Feb 2011 02:48 PM PST The media world is in a tizzy over Apple’s new subscription billing rules for iPad and iPhone apps. Basically, Apple will now take a 30 percent cut of all in-app subscription revenues and own all the customer data. As written, the rules apply to everything from iPad magazines and newspapers to subscription music services and even subscription movie services like Netflix. We’ve debated these rules up and down. In this special episode of Fly or Die, Rhapsody president Jon Irwin joins us to explain how online subscription media businesses work from his perspective. Irwin is one of the few executives brave enough to speak out against the new rules. Rhapsody’s position, in a nutshell, is this:
Rhapsody’s iTunes app is used by a substantial portion of its 750,000 subscribers, but they also listen across other devices. Rhapsody’d service is not limited to the iOS platform. Similarly, many media companies want the ability to bundle print subscriptions with iPad subscriptions to publications. Apple’s new rules complicate such bundling. So will the rules fly or die? I am reminded of a similar move Apple did previously when it changed its rules for how it would handle other mobile ad networks. They issued new rules, which effectively turned out to be a trial balloon. When the market reacted and antitrust investigations were threatened, Apple backed down. The same could happen here, or Apple could choose to selectively enforce the rules against digital publishers but not against music or movie services. |
Have Work, Will Travel: LiquidSpace Aims To Test Their ‘AirBnb For Workspaces’ At SXSW Posted: 18 Feb 2011 02:43 PM PST I don’t know how many times I’ve been visiting a city, looking for a place to work, and have just ended up in a Starbucks. I hate working in Starbucks. But I know they have WiFi, so I go there anyway. Time and time again. But what if a service existed that showed you other options for getting work done when you’re on the go? That’s exactly what LiquidSpace is going to be. The service, which hasn’t launched yet, can most easily be thought of an Airbnb for workplaces. Their aim is to find the best spots around a city to work from and show them to you via a location-based mobile application. But these aren’t Starbucks locations, instead they’ll be offices, business centers, lounges, and all sorts of other places that people have set up with things like WiFi, but are under-utilized at various times. LiquidSpace will help these places maximize their potential. This idea is potentially huge for workers on the go. Certainly an aspect of it will be co-working spaces, but there will also be places more tailored for private work and/or meetings as well. It’s something that I’d probably use every day while on the road. And LiquidSpace is going to see if there are others like me when they do their first major test of the service at the upcoming SXSW conference in Austin, Texas. The team is setting up a bunch of pop-up workspaces around the city that users will be able to reserve. These will be places like Art House, Copa, a few hotels, and even some local startup spaces. They’ll also have a “badass” bus that will roam around the city allowing people to come inside and work. Their partner, Turnstone, is helping them out with all of this. Polaris Ventures’ Dogpatch Labs will offer similar working space during SXSW, and the LiquidSpace guys thinks that’s great and hope they can work together to fill out that space. But the key is the wide variety of spaces they’ll be opening. At the same time, the plan is still to keep the app in limited beta testing throughout the conference so they don’t get bombarded and have nothing to offer most people. We’ll work on getting some invites before the event begins to dish out here. All of this is possible thanks to a nice seed round LiquidSpace has landed from Reid Hoffman (Greylock Discovery) and Mike Maples (Floodgate). The $1.3 million round will put Maples on the Board alongside LiquidSpace co-founders Mark Gilbreath and Doug Marinaro. |
Sarah Lacy’s SF Book Launch Party Is ON! Tickets Available… Now Posted: 18 Feb 2011 01:43 PM PST Last week, Mike promised that, if Sarah Lacy’s new book, Brilliant Crazy, Cocky, reached the number one slot in Amazon’s Entrepreneurship category, we’d host a big launch party in San Francisco. At TechCrunch, we keep our promises. The party in on! Update: Tickets to the event are now completely sold out. If you’d still like to attend, you can try to win a ticket here. The fun kicks off at 6:00p.m. on Wed, Mar 9th at SWIG in San Francisco. Tickets are just $20 which includes an open bar (oh yes), food and a signed copy of the book (which normally retails at $24.95). All of which makes this probably the best value event TechCrunch has ever hosted. And there’s more: a portion of the event proceeds will go to Partners in Health, a group that brings high-quality health care usually reserved for the rich to the poorest people in the world. Known for their long time work in Haiti, Sarah spent time with Partners in Health in Rwanda, seeing the difference they were making in lives close up. You can ask her about it at the party. You can also ask her about the Brilliant, Crazy and Cocky entrepreneurs she met around the world during the reporting of the book. A book which, by the way, USA Today called “a fascinating new gem of a book” that “[gets] inside the heads of idea people,” Fortune said, “Go buy it. Seriously. This is an outstanding piece of journalism,” and New York Magazine just featured in its ‘approval matrix’ between “highbrow” and “brilliant.” So there you go. The venue has limited capacity, so tickets will sell out fast. You already know how much fun TechCrunch events are and – given the international flavor of the book (and the open bar) – this one should be particularly entertaining. For one thing, we’re trying to arrange a fleet of internationally themed food-trucks to give a taste of some of places Sarah travelled. And did I mention the open bar? Tickets are available |
Last Tweets Users See On Banned Client Twidroyd Pushed By Twitter Posted: 18 Feb 2011 01:30 PM PST This morning Twitter shut down UberMedia clients UberTwitter and Twidroyd because of privacy violations for tweets more than 140 characters, monetization violations (concerning affiliate links) as well as trademark infringement. While UberMedia CEO Bill Gross tells us that UberMedia is doing what ever it takes to get the apps back up, currently the final (and only tweets for some users) tweets you can see on the Twidroyd Android app are the below from Twitter’s @support account. @Support UberTwitter, twidroyd, and UberCurrent have been suspended due to policy violations. Read more here: http://t.co/HHGa9k1 about 22 hours ago via webRetweetReply @Support Want to keep using Twitter on your phone? Download an official Twitter client here: http://t.co/rxwSYuW about 22 hours ago via webRetweetReply The first tweet announces the news and the second is a direct link to Twitter’s official app. Twidroyd users did not have to be following the @support account in order to receive the tweets, they were forced by Twitter. According to a thread on Hacker News, this is what happens when a banned app keeps making Twitter API calls. Gobbling up Twitter clients in the past couple of months, UberMedia will control 20% of tweets if its acquisition of Tweetdeck is finalized. Did Twitter, who was late to the game when developing its own in-house apps (mostly through an acquisition of 3rd party client Tweetie), just take down the app market leader in order to promote its own? While this could just be Twitter’s innocent way of breaking the news to app owners (it also sent an email in conjunction with the announcement), it seems like, at least to some, an interesting way to get the message across. Thanks: Fried_Yoda |
The Missing Native/Web App Link: Google Says Native Client Almost Ready To Go Posted: 18 Feb 2011 12:34 PM PST We’ve written a number of things about the contrast between native apps and web apps. The common consensus these days is that the two will eventually converge — but that has been happening more slowly than some have been hoping, particularly in the mobile space where native apps dominate. On the more traditional side of things, the transition is happening faster, but something Google has been working on could be the real missing link: Native Client. And according to Google, it’s getting close to being ready for primetime. As a quick primer, Native Client allows developers to build web apps that execute native code inside the browser. This means that on top of traditional web-based languages like JavaScript, the browser will be able to execute things written in languages like C and C++. More importantly, it will make porting desktop apps to the web much easier. And while the technology is fully open source, it’s clearly being driven by Google. They’ve not only worked the most on Native Client, but they’ve developed other tech such as the Pepper Plugin API (PPAPI) which is an evolution of the Netscape Plugin API (NPAPI), which pretty much all browsers use to handle browser plugins — well, all browsers beside Microsoft Internet Explorer which uses ActiveX. Pepper was made to address the portability and performance issues with NPAPI. Anyway, in a post today on the Chromium blog, Google has announced that Native Client is “getting ready for takeoff“. Google has been working to get full Pepper support, and now they believe they’ve made Native Client “as portable and secure as JavaScript”. And thy’ve just unveiled a completely revamped SDK for the project. Technically, this new SDK is called “Arctic Sea” and it requires Chrome 10 or above (which we just covered yesterday). Also worth noting, with the Pepper support (which is close to being “stable”), Native Client no longer supports NPAPI. You can read more about the new SDK here. [photo: flickr/U.S. Geological Survey] |
UberMedia CEO Bill Gross: Twitter Turn-Off “Took Us By Surprise,” But “We Will Change” Posted: 18 Feb 2011 12:20 PM PST I just got off the phone with UberMedia CEO and Idealab founder Bill Gross on the heels of Twitter’s suspension of two of UberMedia’s products, UberTwitter and Twidroyd, for violating Twitter’s API rules. The violations in question concern trademark, privacy, and monetization. Gross tells me, “We just talked to Twitter and discussed the various issues they raise. It took us by surprise because they didn't raise them before. We started making the changes” UberTwitter will change its name to UberSocial. The privacy issues are related to handling Tweets longer than 140 characters. And the monetization issue, Gross believes, has to do with Twitter’s belief that UberMedia is using affiliate links, which he says it is not. But he is eager to comply with Twitter’s requests and be back in its good graces. “Whatever it is we will change it,” he says. Gross says that he spoke to Twitter to better understand what the issues were and he is “comforted by the fact” that an executive there told him that if he gets UberMedia’s products back into compliance, Twitter will reinstate them. So what message is Twitter trying to send by going after such a big member of the Twitter eco-system in such a public way? “I think that what Twitter is saying is we really, really want you to comply with the terms of service.” Uh-huh. |
Groupme And Foursquare Allow You To Create Texting Groups With Friends Nearby Posted: 18 Feb 2011 11:49 AM PST TechCrunch Disrupt finalist Groupme has launched a cool new feature today, in advance of tomorrow’s Foursquare hackday. People who link their Foursquare accounts to Groupme here can now pull up an interface of all Foursquare friends in the vicinity of their last checkin. You can then select which friends you want to be a part of a texting group, and the app will notify those selected with a text and the group’s number. This is first group texting app I’ve seen to incorporate geo-location — The feature is perfect for the use cases of Coachella-like music festivals, sprawling tech conferences like SXSW or any other place where tons of smartphone wielding individuals tend to congregate in large groups. From the Groupme blog:
Groupme is also open sourcing much of the code behind the new feature, humorously naming it after pop singer John Mayer. Right now the feature isn’t integrated into either service’s mobile app and can only be accessed by those sober enough to remember to visit groupme.com/foursquare on web or on mobile. Hopefully Groupme will use some of its $10.6 million in funding to develop in-app integration some time soon, before SXSWi preferably. |
Twitter Suspends UberMedia Clients For Privacy And Monetization Violations, Trademark Infringement Posted: 18 Feb 2011 11:02 AM PST Well this is interesting. According to this post, Twitter has suspended UberTwitter and Twidroyd for violating its policies. The action is even more fascinating considering that UberMedia, which operates UberTwitter and Twidroyd, is building an army of third-party Twitter clients, including Tweetdeck, that compete directly with Twitter’s web and mobile clients. Here’s the response we received from Carolyn Penner, Twitter’s spokeswoman:
Wow. This is war, and allegations of privacy violations and trademark infringement are serious. By way of history, UberMedia has been scooping up third-party Twitter applications left and right, buying UberTwitter, EchoFon, and Twidroyd. In April 2010, they launched as TweetUp, then they became PostUp, and then, following the UberTwitter deal, they became UberMedia. And the company just raised a boatload of money as well. In terms of the privacy and monetization violations, details are unclear. The trademark infringement most probably refers to the terms UberTwitter or Tweetdeck, since Twitter frowns on the use of either Tweet or Twitter in a third-party developers name. From Twitter’s side, it appears that the company has been expressing its views on these issues for nearly a year. But we’d love to heard what UberMedia’s side of the story is. We’re working to get UberMedia’s response to this sudden turn of events. Something tells me this is going to get ugly. Here’s a copy of the email sent to users:
|
Radiohead’s Day Early Online Release Of ‘The King Of Limbs’ Goes Viral Posted: 18 Feb 2011 10:59 AM PST
On the Internet everyone expects everything a day early. The band surprised everyone this morning by tweeting out “It’s Friday… It’s almost the weekend…You can download ‘The King of Limbs’ now if you so wish,” which led to coverage from Pitchfork to tech blogs , over 2000 retweets and #thekingoflimbs hashtag surpassing Queen Gaga to an impressive position at the top of Twitter trending topics. Radiohead frontman Thom Yorke is also trending. The Rolling Stone explains the um, premature release “They chose to push up the release because everything was ready on their website and so, hey, why not?.” Having primed the digital sales pot with”the pay what you will” model of 2007 release In Rainbows, which “sold” 3 million copies, this time fans have to pony up a fixed amount of cash, $9.00 for MP3s and $14.00 for higher quality WAV files. Further driving in the nail in the coffin of physical music sales, Radiohead is releasing what it is calling a “Newspaper Album” three months from now which will include 625 pages of artwork, a MP3 ($48) or WAV ($53) version of the album and two, 10-inch vinyls — More a collector’s item than anything else. The album is backed by TBD Records in North America, Hostess Entertainment in Asia and XL records in the United Kingdom. In testament to the times we live in, already there are three torrents of the album up on file-sharing service The Pirate Bay. But, in a glimmer of hope for the burgeoning online music industry, one reads “This is for your consideration only. If you like it, buy it. http://www.thekingoflimbs.com/” Watch the video for ‘Lotus Flower’ below. |
TechCrunch Giveaway: A Boxee Box #TechCrunch Posted: 18 Feb 2011 10:30 AM PST We have given away an Apple iPad, Google Chrome Cr-48 Notebooks, a Dell Vostro V130 laptop, a Google Nexus S, and many other prizes over the last few months. We didn’t want to disappoint this time around either, so we are offering a Boxee Box for today’s giveaway. The Boxee Box is a device that finds all of your favorite shows and movies available on the Internet and puts them onto your TV. Not only that, but just this past Valentine’s Day, it was announced that you can browse the Netflix streaming catalog right from the box. Just for fun, here is a demo of the Boxee Box. Want one? Just follow these steps to enter. “Like” us on our TechCrunch Facebook Page: Then do one of the following: - Retweet this post (making sure to include the #TechCrunch hashtag) The contest starts right now and ends tomorrow, February 19th at 7:30pm PST. Like previous giveaways, please only tweet the message once. We will choose at random and contact the winner this weekend with more details. Anyone in the world is eligible, as long as you can receive delivered packages. Good luck and happy Friday! |
You are subscribed to email updates from TechCrunch To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment